First, I was never able to adjust to the author's ponderous writing style. It appeared to me as though she felt that using a lot of big words in odd combinations, would mimic the Regency style of writing and speaking. I am afraid that she failed; at least with me. Many of the big words were used in the wrong context and I found her language to be very unnatural. For example, from page 209: "I have no opinion of my aunt's reaction. I am at a deprivation to venture a notion." Or from page 336: "As every attempt to converse with you became a provocatin in his presence, he became bewildered indeed. I believe you went so far as to challengingly embarrass me at the pianoforte; you did indeed indulge in taunting me exceedingly."

Next, this novel is extremely repetitious. There are many chapters, 71, and most are very short. In almost every chapter, Elizabeth is either thinking of how wonderful, honourable, generous her husband is, or she is telling him how wonderful, honourable, generous he is. Whenever an incident occurs, a description of it is repeated by each set of characters. For example, Elizabeth with tell Mrs. Gardiner, then she will tell Jane, then she will tell Georgiana, etc. And the author does not say that the conversation takes place, but writes out the dialogue each time. The Darcys also repeatedly marvel at the splendid forms of their partner in thought or words.

This story is populated with strangers who bear the names of the characters of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Mr. Darcy is a saint! He always generous to a fault and perfectly honourable in every situation. He is able to be so because of his deep faith and close relationship with God. Elizabeth is not light-hearted and rarely teases, she is often judgemental and cold-hearted. In fact, Mr. Darcy teases more than she does. I cannot describe Anne de Bourgh, Lady Catherine or Colonel Fitzwilliam without giving away the plot, but take my word for it, they are nothing like JA's characters.

I must say at least one thing I liked; the author's treatment of Mr. Bennet. Wimer's Mr. Bennet is nothing at all like Jane Austen's, but he is not offensive he is treated in a most pleasant manner. I cannot say more without including spoilers.

Then, there are the numerous minor  (to some, maybe) things that bother me a lot. Spelling changes: "Ann" without the "e"; "Mariah" with an ending "h". Kitty decides that she wants to be called by her full name, but it is spelled here as "Kathryn" rather than "Catherine". Mr. Darcy's parents are given the names, Deborah and Joseph. Although in one chapter only, the Earl of Matlock mentions his sister, Lady Anne Darcy.

I always feel that everyone should form her/his own opinion, but I cannot recommend that you buy this book. Sorry, but there it is.