What is the point?


REPLIES - POST REPLY - S&S BOARD - FAQ - HOME - Q

Posted by Kathy F. on September 25, 1997 at 20:44:38:


In response to Agreement, written by Sarah on September 25, 1997 at 01:14:56

] That's right - Jane says right from the outset that Margaret bears little importance on the novel.



If she is so unimportant, why was she even in the book at all? Is this another evidence of its being a first novel?--too many superfluous characters?

Kathy




REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.


- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info