Criticism of S&S
Posted by Stephanie S on August 19, 1998 at 18:25:09:
The following criticism of S&S was included in the Illustrated Cabinet Edition of Sense and Sensibility that I found on the web. I thought the comments very interesting since they were included in an edition of S&S. Except for the fact that Elinor and Marianne personalities' feed off each other, I wholeheartedly disagree with the other comments. I still thought I'd share it. Any other comments?
"Sense and Sensibility is on the whole the poorest of Jane Austen's completed novels. The contrast between the two sisters is of course interesting; but they are less individual than the persons in the other tales. The very fact that Elinor stands for Sense and Marianne for Sensibility militates against the reality and charm of their personalities; and the three leading men are less satisfactory than her other heroes. The book is the least original of all her works; and in places sounds as if it were written under the shadow of Richardson's influence. There is of course the same contrast between first impressions and the final reality that appears elsewhere; there is the same endeavour to show that those who have the most ease of manner are not necessarily of the most solid worth. There is in addition the touch of burlesque in the character of Marianne, where Jane Austen is laughing at the sentimentalists; but while all these characteristics are typical of her art, they appear with less subtlety than in the other novels, indeed one might say there is now and then a suggestion of crudity. Edward Ferrars is spineless, Willoughby is a stage villain, and Colonel Brandon is depressing. On the whole, if we had to part with any one of Jane Austen's works, I imagine that Sense and Sensibility is the one that we should most willingly let die."
- Has anyone read... Arnessa 02:43:43 8/23/98 (10)
- Pamela I think. Margie 19:02:17 8/23/98 (9)
- Richardson: I like the man!! :-) Marsha 17:16:34 8/24/98 (1)
- Hear, Hear! nfm Simone 00:49:42 8/26/98 (0)
- Um, I think the one your thinking of is Clarissa... Simone 15:38:34 8/24/98 (0)
- Sounds to me like... Lillian 05:46:34 8/24/98 (5)
- Thanks! Margie 10:43:17 8/24/98 (4)
- Thanks both Arnessa 12:29:33 8/24/98 (3)
- oops Arnessa 13:31:50 8/24/98 (2)
- Ray Bradbury Simone 15:44:31 8/24/98 (1)
- A wonderful book! NFM Marsha 17:18:28 8/24/98 (0)
- Patience, Ladies Mark 11:56:05 8/21/98 (5)
- Well done . . . Mary Anne 20:33:04 8/21/98 (3)
- I thank-you, dear lady, for the complement. Mark 18:12:51 8/24/98 (2)
- "Do not wish it, Miss Dashwood" Barbara 17:48:53 8/25/98 (1)
- That lovely man MarthaK 21:12:01 8/27/98 (0)
- Very good point, Mark. . . (nfm) Stephanie S 16:43:47 8/21/98 (0)
- Obviously related to the fool I mentioned on the P&P board. nfm caitlin 13:30:59 8/20/98 (0)
- Burlesque???????????????? Jimmy 12:28:36 8/20/98 (0)
- Who in the world . . . . Brenda T. 00:17:28 8/20/98 (0)
- Stage villain??? Stage villain ?!?! Marsha 21:23:40 8/19/98 (1)
- Yumm! Aurora2468 23:13:29 8/20/98 (0)
- Aaarrrrgh!!! Cherie 18:43:15 8/19/98 (2)
- Sorry . . . ;-) Mary Anne 20:13:14 8/19/98 (1)
- It's hard Cherie 00:04:35 8/20/98 (0)
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.