re:comments
Posted by Deborah C. on March 10, 1998 at 13:01:23:
In response to Thoughts upon seeing the movie again, written by Mark on March 10, 1998 at 10:56:27
I know Jane Austen had written Elinor as a 19 year old, but
I doubt that you can really expect such maturity in 19 year
olds, so I think the age changing in the movie is very reasonable
and appropriate. I can not see anyone else doing the part better
than ET. I think all major parts in the movies are very well
casted except maybe Hugh Grant. If you really want to verify
just how good AR is, watch the S&S produced by BBC in the 1980's .
AR gives Brendon so much that was completely missing in the
BBC version. By the way, I don't think Ang Lee likes Hugh Grant
that much. He made comments to Taiwan reports along the line
of ' he only cares how good he looks, he does not care about
how good his performance is'.
- Swooning Keith Logan 03:42:25 3/11/98 (7)
- re:Brandon Deborah C. 10:27:45 3/11/98 (6)
- S&S question Dottie 17:11:00 3/11/98 (1)
- HBO vs. Purchased tape. Kathleen Ann 10:44:36 3/12/98 (0)
- Handsome? Kathleen Ann 15:35:39 3/11/98 (1)
- Re: Handsome? Anita T 15:20:17 3/19/98 (0)
- S&S2 Keith Logan 10:56:50 3/11/98 (1)
- Nothing wrong with arguing... Arnessa 22:18:06 3/11/98 (0)
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.