I bet that...
Posted by The Mysterious H.C. on September 16, 1998 at 14:35:40:
In response to I may have to ask her!, written by Caroline on September 16, 1998 at 09:06:08
] I'm beginning to think that baldness was something that didn't happen in Regency England!;-)
]
...men who were completely or almost completely bald didn't go blatantly exposing their chrome domes for all to see all that often, since they could have still worn wigs even after most other men had given them up, and anyay all men wore hats most of the time in public. Now, a little receding in the front would be expected to be visible more often, but I can't lay my hands on any illustration of such right at the moment (it's not something I've been looking for...)
- What got me started on this.... Caroline 17:02:50 9/16/98
(2)
- Charlie Amy 21:46:44 9/16/98
(1)
- Acceptability Caroline 22:35:11 9/16/98
(0)
- Acceptability Caroline 22:35:11 9/16/98
(0)
- Charlie Amy 21:46:44 9/16/98
(1)
- Mark Strong in a Knightley pause?? Ann2 15:42:49 9/16/98
(0)
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.
