Yes, I'd say they were rather well "associated!" ;-) (nt)
Posted by Woodhouse on September 09, 1998 at 20:05:26:
In response to It was a boy!, written by Constanza on September 09, 1998 at 17:01:56
] Galleon and Woodhouseh, thanks for the information.
] I did a quick search in Internet and found out the following information:
] Thomas Garth
] born 1800.Weymouth, Dorset
] died AFT 1839
] father: General Thomas Garth
] mother: Sophia Hanover
] relationship: associated (that means not married, not known marriage or historically associated)
] Source: Index to Royal Genealogical Data - University of Hume
] I wonder what happened to the child and why his parents never married. I mean, it must have been quite a scandal for a Royal Princess to be a single mother in those times.
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.