But why?
Posted by P. Bingham on April 13, 1998 at 23:32:00:
In response to I suppose. But they should have at least LOOKED embarassed(NFM), written by Greg on April 13, 1998 at 21:38:03
I would think that they'd be expected to show unstudied affection and what's wrong with a peal of fresh giggles backstage? The only reason that I can think of for them not to be kissing outside of the church on their wedding day would be if the bride were, uh, already showing the effects of their affection. (as Fanny Brice would tell you in Funny Girl). And even then, as previous posts will tell you Inot so very far down), that was not so unpopular either. What say you to that?
Patricia
- Two answers for the price of one... Greg 22:03:06 4/14/98
(5)
- greetings everyone. P. Bingham 03:07:57 4/16/98
(3)
- As time goes by Greg 01:54:56 4/18/98
(2)
- getting near another's mouth. P. Bingham 23:53:57 4/18/98
(1)
- correction! P. Bingham 23:56:16 4/18/98
(0)
- correction! P. Bingham 23:56:16 4/18/98
(0)
- getting near another's mouth. P. Bingham 23:53:57 4/18/98
(1)
- As time goes by Greg 01:54:56 4/18/98
(2)
- the kiss! P. Bingham 22:54:47 4/14/98
(0)
- greetings everyone. P. Bingham 03:07:57 4/16/98
(3)
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.
