some more questions abou the dear colonel!

Posted by Caroline on January 07, 1998 at 10:13:09:

In response to Just Barely, written by Ken on January 07, 1998 at 09:08:46

Ken, we have occasionally speculated on whether Col. FitzStudmuffi-, er, Fitzwilliam,was, in fact a member of one of the househiold regiments, and never went to war at all, or whether he wasn't infantry but cavalry. Would you like to run with that idea, and see what you can turn up?

Also, is the Rothenbrg book at Bookserve ( I couldn't get though to find out),and is it worth putting in the bibliography ? and if it is....well, you know what I want from you, don't you?

REPLIES:

• Can Check Ken 13:22:44 1/07/98 (4)
  • Very interesting, but... ElaineL 22:25:29 1/07/98 (3)
    • No Problem Ken 09:07:04 1/08/98 (2)
      • So clear! ElaineL 11:36:02 1/09/98 (1)
        • Training Ken 14:36:33 1/09/98 (0)

Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.