link
Posted by Chael on October 04, 1998 at 22:53:17:
In response to here's why..., written by Chael on October 04, 1998 at 22:42:56
This isn't the same site I found, and it is a different case than the one I read about. In this case To Kill a Mockingbird was challenged because someone objected to one part of the novel without thinking about what the novel is really standing for...
- a better link Chael 23:11:23 10/04/98
(1)
- banned books link lizard 02:46:11 10/05/98
(0)
- banned books link lizard 02:46:11 10/05/98
(0)
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.
