Quick site index Library board index Home Frequently Asked Questions Map


Jane Eyre

Posted by Emma Elizabeth Anne on September 02, 1998 at 07:00:23:

Back to the LibraryI'm sure that a lot of people who visit this page will have read Jane Eyre (Charlotte Bronte) and enjoyed it, but I just want to exploit this opportunity to raise a discussion point that interested me...

I remember reading somewhere that Charlotte Bronte was disdainful of her sisters for making their heroes and heroines handsome and beautiful simply as a matter of course. Although I love reading about the beautiful, clever girl falling in love with the tall-dark-and-handsome hero - (after all, what is fiction for? =) - I also agree with Charlotte. Is it better to have the central characters always physically beautiful, or is a story improved when the heroes and heroines are, as Jane Eyre describes herself, "poor, little, obscure and plain"??

I found that I could love Mr Rochester and Jane and feel more for their story because they were different from your standard hero and damsel. I could identify with their insecurties, and get closer to the characters, because they were not perfect. Other books and movies run as though passionate love is/was restricted to the rich and beautiful. I think that perhaps Charlotte was right - it should not be "a matter of course" that romantic heroes and heroines be beautiful, clever and talented.

Are there any other opinions on the subject? =)




REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.




- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info