Don't apologize...
Posted by Bonny on June 19, 1998 at 08:36:59:
In response to A hurried answer with random thoughts, written by Constanza on June 18, 1998 at 08:46:04
...When you make such great points!
] ] -he decides its not just his education at fault w/ his daughters, but something wanting within - "principle, active principle had been wanting". In contrast, Fanny does have active principle and I think thats what we've been getting at, Constanza. He talks about theory & practice in religion, which Lea has foregrounded in her post.
] Might it be that "intent" is twofold, one part aimed at acquiring and accepting God's principles and the other at letting them be your guide? If you remain in that first stage you are in danger of letting your whole life be guided by appearances. There is a dynamic in the intent that makes all the difference. This would be Sir Thomas' fault and Edmund's danger.
A good way of seeing this aspect.
] The father is a sort of "warning" to Edmund. Sir Thomas, judging by appearances, had married Lady Bertram; Edmund is about to do so in relation to Mary. So, if he had married Mary, he would in time had become another Sir T. . By the end of the novel, both realize their mistakes (they become self-aware) and change for good.
] The turning point for change is self-awareness; that is why neither Mary nor Henry can change. In order to do so, they must acknowledge their errors (sort of conscience examination).
] Sorry if it looks like a telegram; I am in a hurry! :-)
No, its great!
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.
