Posted by Kathy F. on June 08, 1997 at 15:45:52:

Why was the secret engagement of Jane Fairfax and Frank Churchill so morally reprehensible in Emma but the secret engagement of Lucy Steele and Edward Ferrars no big problem in S&S? Was it that people object to LS so violently that the bad morals of the secrecy was not thought of?
Thanks for any input.
Kathy

Follow Ups:

• Re: S&S and Emma Margie 11:08:40 6/12/97 (5)
  • Re: S&S and Emma Kathy F. 22:41:03 6/14/97 (0)
  • Re: S&S and Emma Margie, again 11:32:57 6/12/97 (3)
    • Re: S&S and Emma Cheryl 13:13:01 6/12/97 (2)
      • Re: S&S and Emma Ann 22:40:00 6/12/97 (0)
      • Re: S&S and Emma Margie 22:26:17 6/12/97 (0)
• Re: S&S and Emma JulieII 16:44:30 6/08/97 (7)
  • Re: S&S and Emma Ann 21:26:56 6/08/97 (4)
    • Re: S&S and Emma Barbara 15:33:33 6/11/97 (1)
      • Re: S&S and Emma Kathy F. 22:51:37 6/14/97 (0)
    • Re: S&S and Emma Lynne 18:38:20 6/10/97 (0)
    • Re: S&S and Emma Kathy F. 17:47:26 6/10/97 (0)
  • Re: S&S and Emma Kathy F. 18:07:03 6/08/97 (1)
    • Re: S&S and Emma MaryC 23:51:08 6/18/97 (0)
• Re: S&S and Emma--oops Kathy F. 15:47:46 6/08/97 (2)
  • Re: S&S and Emma--oops Janea 06:32:50 6/12/97 (1)
    • Re: S&S and Emma--oops Margie 14:51:54 6/12/97 (0)

Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.