Col Fitzwilliam revisited


REPLIES - POST REPLY - THE LIBRARY - FAQ - HOME - Q

Posted by Kate on December 11, 1997 at 17:06:29:

I notice in the last sentence of Ch 36, that JA notes that "Colonel Fitzwilliam was no longer an object"... suggesting that he had been one before...




REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.


- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info