P&P0 and P&P2


REPLIES - POST REPLY - THE LIBRARY - FAQ - HOME - Q

Posted by Kate on December 04, 1997 at 08:50:20:


In response to P&P0, written by RachelE on December 04, 1997 at 02:07:56

]
] ] Seriously though, I have always looked upon the adaptations as just another carefully considered opinion. (P&P0 doesn't count!)
]


]
] May I ask *why* P&P0 doesn't count? I know it's very much shortened, but I really enjoyed it, and never think of Lady Catherine de Bourgh without hearing it as Collins said it in that movie.

I think by COUNTING, Mark means that it is a serious attempt to interpret the novel to modern audiences. By changing the period, the plot and the characters so much as it did, I think he's trying to say that it is not such a serious attempt.


] Then again, I haven't seen P&P2 yet.

Get thee to a video store, girl! You haven't lived. And you can hire the whole six hours for the price of a two hour movie. And wallow....







REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.


- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info