There was another QUESTION...


REPLIES - POST REPLY - THE LIBRARY - FAQ - HOME - Q

Posted by Karen R on November 22, 1997 at 12:21:05:


In response to No poetry for your ruckus, alas, written by Jane Elizabeth on November 21, 1997 at 19:48:48

I can't believe I didn't convey this to you, but one of the more nagging questions in my mind has been Ash (not who he was--Browning, Tennyson, Swinburne, Coleridge, ad infinitum) but why he didn't have a name poem as the other three did. No matter what source I consulted--and there were a few--I could not find any poem entitled "Randolph." Pretty unpoetic a name!! Anyway, I am firmly convinced (as I was about the other subject) that she did that intentionally. This was her little bit of information that she was not going to disclose. You know, we can't ever know the whole truth. Her last little tantalizing tidbit of bafflement!!!

So if you ever run into her again ;-p be sure to ask her and get back to me at rosie45@hotmail.com.





REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.


- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info