Posted by lucie on November 21, 1997 at 13:55:06:
In response to Yes, and . . . (**spoiler alert**), written by Sara J on November 20, 1997 at 22:36:48
] No problem at all understanding you!
] I agree! Perhaps JA provided these two relationships (Charlotte & Mr. Collins, Lydia & Wickham) to serve as the two extremes (social vs. sexual), which puts Elizabeth & Darcy's relationship (or eventual relationship) somewhere in the more desirable middle . . . with both partners intelligent and with a mutual regard and attraction/affection for each other which is, of course, ideal. I thinks it's just one more reason this story is timeless; there are relationships based solely on convenience and relationships based solely on attraction, yet the ideal most of us strive for/dream of is a combination of both. I like to think Lizzy & Darcy have it.
I think you have hit the nail on the head, thats why I've been reading this book for thirty years and never tire of it.
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.