Karen, Karen, Karen


REPLIES - POST REPLY - THE LIBRARY - FAQ - HOME - Q

Posted by Cassia on November 04, 1997 at 15:47:51:


In response to New Subject: Randy Ash??, written by Karen R on November 03, 1997 at 15:27:17

] Just thought I'd try to get a little more controversy going? What do you think of Ash? On this reading, my opinion of him has changed radically. I have decided that he is a hypocrite, a jerk, a liar, a cheat, a phony... Did I leave anything out?

] Any opinions on this?


You make Ash sound like Willoughby or Wickham when he's much more a Frank Churchill sort.

But he had known immediately tht she was for him, she was to do with him, as she really was or could be, or in freedom might have been

I am not safe, with you. But I have no desire to be elsewhere

The sexual compulsion is mutual and it is between them. Like magenets or moths to flame the draw is the danger for both of them risk the comfort of their present lives when they board that train. They risk shattering the illusion they had built between them in the letters. They risk not being able to leave and go back to the old life. They are complusive gamblers, their secret their mutual drug. The risk is all.

The devil advocate role suits you!;-)




REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.


- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info