Why didn't she? (Your opinions, please)
Posted by Rachel on October 17, 1997 at 18:35:50:
In response to Stable fall back, written by Ann on October 14, 1997 at 23:59:00
] I would argue that she did have something to fall back on, but failed to take matters into her own hands. She had known since Gateshead that she had a rich uncle, but she didn't do anything about it.
True! I always wondered why she didn't take her money and write her uncle. Was it because Mr. Briggs said he would probably be dead? Still, someone might have answered her inquiries. What do all of you think?
Rachel, who is now curious about others' opinions on this matter
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.