A big small book


REPLIES - POST REPLY - THE LIBRARY - FAQ - HOME - Q

Posted by Mark on October 17, 1997 at 14:17:00:


In response to I wanted to, addendum, written by Ann on October 17, 1997 at 12:31:41

] ] I was thinking of spending 6 weeks on P&P, so that would mean doing ACC after New Years! Then there is NA, which I have in mind for the read after P&P.

] ] I am open to suggestions, though.

]


] Could we start P&P, then break off for the holidays (people, perhaps, are going to be too busy for a serious discussion on P&P anyway), read ACC, then get back to P&P later? I know that is convoluted, but do people think it might work? Is there enough interest in ACC to try?


I'm game. I, myself, wouldn't mind postponing P&P for a couple of weeks so that we could do ACC before all the adaptations start. It not like we've never had a chance to discuss P&P here at Pemberley. But I do not presume to speak for anybody else.




REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.


- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info