Realism in Austen


REPLIES - POST REPLY - THE LIBRARY - FAQ - HOME - Q

Posted by Patti on October 16, 1997 at 19:13:31:


In response to Blameless? Faultless?, written by Ann on October 15, 1997 at 23:13:29


] ] But to me, Austen is all ritual. Feeling is human; it's a part of life. Actually I think Bronte's characters were more human, not the good, attractive blameless people that make up Austen's heroines. Jane Eyre was human and admitted her faults, her emotions likewise.

]



] Elizabeth Bennet, Marianne Dashwood, and particularly Emma all have lots of problems and the stories are driven by those faults.

I can't think of two faults of Elizabeth Bennet. She seemed the usual heroine to me; pretty, clever, good. But then you have Jane,who is far from perfect and admits her deficiencies, but is someone who we can identify with better.


] JA writes in a far more natural style with more realistic dialogue. Her stories also hang together much better than JE.


Yes, and I find reading Austen's novels very similar to reading a newspaper description of a wedding.

I do like Jane Austen and am not trying to put down her works, but one would like a little feeling and deepness in a book.




REPLIES:




Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.


- Republic of Pemberley -
Home | Q | Jane Info