But still..
Posted by Mark on September 22, 1997 at 16:38:55:
In response to scott/york adaptation, written by nancymc on September 21, 1997 at 20:51:21
] ] ]
] ] ] ] Is this a "lost" show, or does anybody else know anything about it?
] ] ]
] ] ] i found this on the Internet movie data base, if anyone is interested.
] ]
] ] I am actually old eneough to clearly remember this version and I can't find it anywhere. Its good but Mr. Rochester is too old (looks like he's in his late 50's or early 60's. As far as I know there is the Orson Welles/Joan Fontaine (still my fav), Susannah York/George C. Scott, Timothy Dalton, John Hurt and now this one. If anyone know of others, please (all you people in the Commonwealth) post them.
]
]
] The 1971 adaptation of Jane Eyre, an excellent one, I think, is available on videotape from Critics Choice for under $20. I look forward to comparing Scott's Rochester to Hinds'.
I don't think it was the Scott/York adaptation. The one I saw stretched over several nights. I don't think Rochester was George C. Scott. I would have remembered THAT since I had seen "Patton" two years before and loved it. You don't easily forget that voice of his. I also don't think it was S. York who played Jane. If I recall, this actress was bigger boned than she. But I could be mistaken since it was over twenty years ago.
Posting followups to old messages is disabled; instead go to the main index and post a new message which mentions this one.
