Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


GR: And, not or   Written by Barbara (9/20/2003 6:34 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, GR: So -- sense or sensibility?, penned by Lucy K
Are you new?

] One can infer from the title that Jane Austen may have been attempting to, by this story, demonstrate the relative virtues or dangers of sense vs sensibility. One can say that Elinor stands for "sense" while Marianne for "sensibility".

] So if you buy into that premise, which do you think "won out" in JA's universe?

Quite the contrary, IMO. It's Sense and Sensibility...an important distinction.

---not Sense or Sensibility

--not Sense vs. Sensibility

I think the 'and' is the whole point there. One is not meant to 'win out' over the other or conquer the other. They are not mutually exclusive. The ideal is to strive for balance. Both Marianne and Elinor possess both of these qualities, as do their future husbands. Marianne may develop more sense, but she is still in full possession of her sensibility. Elinor always had a lot of sensibility, but it was under good regulation by her sense.

Lacking in one of the qualities, or allowing one to be expressed to the exclusion of the other is no recipe for happiness.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Sense & Sensibility is maintained by Barbara with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast