Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Yes   Written by Laraine (9/3/2003 3:15 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, GR: Children, penned by Cheryl
Are you new?

] She's just a kid.

From what I know of the period, kids were generally outside the world of people who counted. They were either noisy and spoiled, like the Middleton children, or they were much more well mannered like the the Harville's children in Persuasion, but they were notable for how well behaved they were. Young people counted after a young woman was out or a young man home from school. People might love their children or younger siblings, but this appears to be the generally accepted rule. To focus more than that on your children seems to suggest an unbecoming pride and selfishness--as it does in Lady Middleton and in Fanny Dashwood.

It wasn't until the Victorian era that we began to turn the focus of the family toward children. It's been increasing ever since then, it seems to me (but I am not inviting any comments on whether that's good or bad, please).


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Sense & Sensibility is maintained by Barbara with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast