GR-Agree

GR-Agree Written by BarbaraB (8/12/2003 6:29 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, GR: Yes, that's my point, penned by Golda

] ] It's possible that, though Edward has few lines so far, what he says may convey more meaning than appears on the surface. (snip)

] Yes, I think Edward's economy of words shouts volumes, as we will see later in the story.

Yes, much meaning in what he doesn't say.

GR: Shadowy Edward Cheryl (8/10/2003 3:46 p.m.)

GR: Choosing to describe and not demonstrate Edward Colin P (8/12/2003 7:01 a.m.)
GR Edward's 'feminine side'? Barbara (8/10/2003 9:50 p.m.)
Emotional Edward -- Not Golda (8/10/2003 5:18 p.m.)
- GR: Edward's First Words Valerie Mc. (8/10/2003 10:34 p.m.)
  - GR: Yes, that's my point Golda (8/11/2003 12:59 p.m.)
    - GR-Agree BarbaraB (8/12/2003 6:29 a.m.)
    - GR: And... Vianne (8/11/2003 1:04 p.m.)
Not enough E & E Deborah Jane (8/10/2003 4:56 p.m.)
- GR: Emma Thompson's Edward Annette J. (8/10/2003 7:58 p.m.)
  - GR: Movie Edward Cheryl (8/10/2003 8:09 p.m.)
    - GR: No need for a reason to fall in love then Candice Michelle (8/11/2003 2:18 p.m.)
      - GR: No need for a reason Annette J. (8/12/2003 6:13 a.m.)
        
        GR - SPOILERS above LaurieC (8/12/2003 8:50 a.m.)
      - GR: real reasons   Barbara (8/11/2003 2:43 p.m.)
        
        JA's Edward as rice pudding   Jenny Allan (8/11/2003 3:44 p.m.)
        
        Please use GR in posts (nfm)   Barbara (8/11/2003 3:51 p.m.)

Sense & Sensibility is maintained by Barbara with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -