Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Cassandra and the letters   Written by Mary-L (3/13/2003 12:49 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Re: Cassandra not burning letters.., penned by Leif G-n
Are you new?

] You highly recommend the book of facsimile letters. Does it mean I wonder that they are easily readable? Are the quality good emough


] so they can be read without a magnifying glass?
] The volume is rather expensive i think so it would be good to know
] before we buy.

Leif G-n: The letters range from very to somewhat readable, with a few (interlined or cross-hatched) almost impossible, but I keep a copy of Le Faye's Letters right at hand to make out the difficult spots. The great value of the facsimile letters, to me, is to see just how she wrote-- the dashes, the abbreviations, the punctuation, the way she shaped the words and letters, just as it came from her pen! They give such an aura of the real person, to me.

Yes, the book is expensive. I got it at James Cummins Booksellers (through ABE, I believe) and am totally delighted at its excellent condition, perfect dust jacket and all. And I deserve it!

] About Cassandra not burning the letters. She might not have. But she still destroyed many of them didn't she? At least D.Le Faye believes so in her 1995 edition of the JA Letters.

Yes, there are only 148 letters in Chapman's original list, although a few more have been discovered. But clearly, JA wrote a much greater number of letters to Cassandra, and others, that have never been found. Did Cassandra destroy some? I suppose it is possible, although she carefully preserved the ones we have today. I am persuaded by Modert's analysis that most of the missing letters were misplaced in moves or casually destroyed by the recipients. And I definitely believe that Caroline's recollection of what Cassandra told her-- about burning the letters, many years earlier-- was not correct.

]Or you don't mean that they could have survived and disappeared in some other way? Could there even be a chance that they still exist,laying covered in dust and cobweb in some attic,waiting to be discovered?
] My imagination is carrying me away,I can almost see them now.
] Discovered by me. What a sensation !

Modert's documentation often describes letters that were once in someone's collection and had been transcribed, but are no longer traceable. Over and over: "Present owner and location unknown." What a terrible loss! But one was discovered as recently as 1988, I believe! What are presented in this volume are facsimile's of all currently known letters, from many different collections.

Modert believed it was possible that more would be discovered as scholarship focuses more intently on the letters. The rather dismissive attitude of JA's descendants, that the letters wouldn't be of real interest to the public, steered researchers away from looking at them as an important resource. So dream on, Leif G-n!


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Jane Austen's Life & Times is maintained by JulieW with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast