Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Basis for argument..?   Written by Leif G-n (3/12/2003 5:04 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Is It, Then?, penned by Jack Cerf
Are you new?

] Some of us would be more comfortable with Austen if her social and political values were more like our own, but I think that's a temptation to be resisted. She's a critic, to be sure, but not a Dickensian critic. The objects of her scorn are people who abuse their positions in the hierarchy and fail to live up to their traditional responsibilities -- not the hierarchy itself.

The basis for our argument is a bit thin.
I just find it hard to believe that she should have been so "blind" to the overall picture, so "narrowsighted".
Can we take her novels and the remaining letters and biographical notes as a proof of that? I'm not so sure. Did she never even for a moment question the values of her own class ? If I may quote what another author(Jane Aiken Hodge) says about her: "Jane Austen did her best to conform to the conventions of her day,and after her death the family touched up the picture.She was 'dear aunt Jane'. She played ,supremely well, the part that was expected of her."
But what did she really think? We are all guessing aren't we.

Leif G-n


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Jane Austen's Life & Times is maintained by JulieW with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast