Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Unfortunate James   Written by Karen G. (3/3/2003 10:41 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Why Edward?, penned by Golda
Are you new?


] I had understood from various bios that Edward was next in line, as it were. I think that I read in the Shields bio that Edward was selected for the Knights because George and Cassandra thought that James, the first son, was to be the heir of the Leigh-Perrot fortune. It ultimately did not work out for James. The second son, George, was not an option due to his health and disability. So Edward, third son, was chosen for the Knights.

This reminds me of Mrs. Bennet indicating to Mr. Collins that Jane was nearly engaged already, so suggestively leading him to Elizabeth. James was overlooked since was nearly inheriting the Leigh-Perrot fortune as you say. Unfortunately, the Leigh-Perrots didn't pan out. I think that was more due to defiance by the cleptomaniac aunt than for anything more (What was her first name? I don't have a bio at hand.) The only thing fortunate for James was that he took over his childhood home (but then he must not have liked that well, since wasn't it James that eventually tore it down for something larger?)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Jane Austen's Life & Times is maintained by JulieW with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast