But I thought...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

But I thought... Written by Reeba (5/17/2005 8:11 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, What's with Sir William's ignorance? Highly preposterous!, penned by PeggyC

that his interference earlier regarding the two ladies they were to accompany to London was based on the fact that he knew how it was with his nephew.

Maybe he didn't know how bad things were, or he didn't have proof enough.

I also wonder if the people would talk freely about Mr. Thornhill's misconduct with the girls in the village, that too to a stranger.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

What's with Sir William's ignorance? Highly preposterous! PeggyC (5/16/2005 10:36 p.m.)

credibility is strained Tara O'Donnell (5/17/2005 10:04 a.m.)
- Sir William's "proposal" Lynn Marie (5/18/2005 10:23 a.m.)
  - I agree. (nfm) Emmeline (5/19/2005 8:05 a.m.)
  - I thought Lynn (5/18/2005 10:57 a.m.)
    - It seemed a bit mean Carey (5/18/2005 11:38 p.m.)
- Ability to surprise LaurieC (5/18/2005 9:18 a.m.)
  - Yes Carey (5/18/2005 11:36 p.m.)
But I thought... Reeba (5/17/2005 8:11 a.m.)
I wondered about it, too. Emmeline (5/17/2005 8:03 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo