Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


The argument   Written by LaurieC (5/2/2005 11:55 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Ch.7: Is this what "philosophical arguments"..., penned by Line
Are you new?

I may be wrong, but I don't believe it was meant to be a real argument, because the Squire was "winking on the rest of the company, to prepare us for the sport..." I thought it ultimately showed the mean-spirited nature of the Squire, since he was making a prolonged joke at the expense of young Moses. I don't think we are supposed to know what they are arguing about, because the Squire apparently makes some of this stuff up, i.e., "...the first part of my enthymem deficient secundum quoad, or quoad minus,..." Yikes!

I thought it quite funny that in the closing paragraph of chapter 7, Olivia has read a "great deal of controversy," including Thwackum and Square (characters who I remember from the Tom Jones group read). I suspect that this chapter is making fun of high-toned philosophers. If there is another interpretation, I'd love to read it, because this was a little difficult to follow.

:-)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast