Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


maybe (not)   Written by Stephanie (9/16/2012 7:11 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, I think Barbara has just summed it up,, penned by Paisley
Are you new?

The woman's property did not necessarily become the husband's, if legal means were in place prior to her marriage. If money was settled on her, or her children, it was kept out of the husband's control.

However, Mrs. Dashwood's uncle could not enforce such a stricture across the generations after his own demise, so I suppose he had to assume it would not be done.

I still mourn that he did not assume the family would not be taken care of unless he did it.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast