Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
engaged couples and sexual activity
Written by Heather Leigh
(10/8/2009 11:54 a.m.)
in consequence of the missive, Eliza knowing better, penned by Bridget D
Engagement, especially once it was made public, was considered a binding relationship - effectively a marriage. An engaged couple might put off marrying until they had sufficient income, steady employment, and/or a suitable place to live, but they had committed their hearts and future, and it wasn't surprising if their bodies followed. (It would obviously become a problem if they got pregnant.) So a SECRET engagement must have put them in an ambiguous state re: how much sexual activity was okay... more than none, but less than all. I imagine it would have been hard to take for long. And it would have given one fiance/e more leverage to push the other into sex. Somehow I can imagine Lucy pushing Edward sexually! to cement his feeling of connection/obligation to her. Makes me think of the conversation between Mrs. Croft and Mrs. Musgrove about a LONG or open-ended engagement -- maybe one of the risks there would be that the engaged couple wouldn't be able to keep their sexual relationship in check indefinitely (unless they were living apart). |

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
