Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


sins of commission/omission   Written by Heather Leigh (10/4/2009 9:04 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Willoughby John D and Fanny, penned by Bridget D
Are you new?

ooh, thank you - that works for me - that John D and Fanny and Willoughby can be placed on a continuum of selfishness and heartlessness -- John and Fanny by failing to act, and Willoughby by his actions. That's a clearer way to express what I was getting at in saying Willoughby was more "open" in his selfishness etc.

Of course then you could argue that John and Fanny are just as wicked because their sins of omission are premeditated and carefully (speciously) rationalized, while Willoughby's sins of commission begin as passionate impulses. Though he does rationalize them after the fact, and coldly/premeditatedly cuts off contact with Marianne and Eliza after making them dependent on him.

His seductions might be written off as "crimes of passion," results of excessive ardor and sensual impulse, but his abandonments are cold and calculated.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast