Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Well....   Written by Rachel G (10/3/2009 5:14 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Wondered if I had missed something!, penned by CarolTS
Are you new?

I was extrapolating freely from Col.Brandon's statement in Ch.31:

"I could not trace her beyond her first seducer, and there was every reason to fear that she had removed from him only to sink deeper in a life of sin."

I guess it's a matter of definition. The magistrate Patrick Colquhoun in his 1796 "Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis", included in his estimate of the number of prostitutes in London all women living with a man without having undergone a recognised marriage ceremony. The attitude which underlay this very broad definition was not peculiar to Colquhoun, but was shared by some clergy and moralists of the time.

Refs:
"The Mouth of Strange Women is a Deep Pit": Male Guilt and Legal Attitudes Toward Prostitution in Georgian London. By Anthony E. Simpson. Journal of Criminal justice and Popular Culture, Vol.4, Issue3,page 50. Nov.1996.

"Disorderly Women in Eighteenth-Century London", by Tony Henderson. Longman/Pearson Education 1999.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast