Is there proof in this week's reading

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Is there proof in this week's reading Written by CarolTS (9/29/2009 2:37 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Edward was pre-engaged, penned by Leah Noel

about Willoughby not being pre-engaged? There's a thread on the board that has quite a few very telling sentences where you could read it that way.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

How can Elinor forgive Edward so quickly? Barbara (9/25/2009 2:56 p.m.)

True. nan duval (9/26/2009 11:04 p.m.)
More on this topic in Chapter 28 kathleen (elder) (9/26/2009 5:41 p.m.)
- Willoughby's behavior Barb JA (9/29/2009 6:57 a.m.)
  - But allowing an attachment to form was unprincipled, no? kathleen (elder) (9/29/2009 9:08 a.m.)
    - I see what you mean Barb JA (9/29/2009 10:00 a.m.)
- Edward was pre-engaged Leah Noel (9/28/2009 9:31 p.m.)
  - Is there proof in this week's reading CarolTS (9/29/2009 2:37 a.m.)
Engagements Diane DeS (9/26/2009 12:57 a.m.)
- Worse than being a cad Barbara (9/26/2009 1:33 a.m.)
  - Thank you for that Barb JA (9/26/2009 7:35 a.m.)
  - I love this post... Moni (9/26/2009 6:41 a.m.)
I assume she thought he was "innocent" kathleen (elder) (9/25/2009 5:30 p.m.)
- Yes, very easy to blame Lucy LouAnn (9/27/2009 2:44 p.m.)
- That's true. Barbara (9/25/2009 6:43 p.m.)
Well, I think the thought was rather flattering to Elinor Elbè (9/25/2009 3:04 p.m.)
- Yes, and she also is aware... Moni (9/26/2009 6:43 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo