Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


I agree.   Written by nan duval (9/26/2009 10:54 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Rather strong criticism of a kindly man, I think!, penned by Cathy Allen
Are you new?

Sir John's fault is in being indiscriminately "nice"--setting no limits on his gregariousness. He provides a home for the Dashwood ladies at an affordable rent, he keeps them stocked with game & garden stuff when they are not at his own table; he would love to see them set up with good husbands. He takes in the Steeles; he wants to keep everyone happy. I think it's ok to allow him some entertainment at supposed romances since he believes that everyone is as open & honorable as he is so he can't imagine duplicity or unkindness. He truly thinks everything will work out for the best. If he is childish it is only in being innocent & free of guile. He may not be the most scintillating conversationalist but he is a good man. I would enjoy having him as a friend--Ms.Armstrong, not so much.


I think he lets Lady Middleton's criticisms go in one ear & out the other without offence or alteration.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast