Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Perhaps the epistolary version was more like a screen adaptation?   Written by Tom P2 (9/24/2009 5:59 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, You make some really good arguments, penned by Anselm
Are you new?

Your train of thought reminds me of the debate about whether Marianne is a full co-heroine or a more secondary character. My current thinking is that she's secondary in the novel, but on screen her significance catches up with Elinor's, because the reader/viewer no longer sits in a privileged position inside Elinor's head. Perhaps, in the epistolary version, the important conversations between Lucy and Elinor were still hidden from the reader at this point in the story?

Just speculating!


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast