Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


You make some really good arguments   Written by Anselm (9/24/2009 4:55 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, I'm guessing, penned by Barb JA
Are you new?

Basically, I don't know how to reconcile these two opposing viewpoints. If you want to risk spoilers, have a look at Ellen Moody's calendar, linked below (which I've also linked from another message). It incorporates a detailed essay on just this issue. Her two basic points are:

1. There is an Austen family tradition that Elinor and Marianne was an epistolatory novel.

2. The story is constructed on epistolatory principles, namely several concurrent storylines that work well when they take the form of juxtaposed letters. These dramatic contrasts fade when they are incorporated into a single narrative storyline with the subsidiary stories told as flashbacks later in the narrative.

It might also be worth remembering that Lady Susan, her brilliant novel-in-letters, was possibly written in 1794, around the time of Elinor and Marianne.

But this still doesn't get around the general problem that you've raised, namely the fact that the novel is constructed largely around Elinor's silence, and specifically the problem of Ch.23.


Ellen Moody's S&S calendar and article

Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast