1794

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

1794 Written by Barbara (9/18/2009 3:23 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, The painting...?, penned by BarbaraB

The painting was done in 1794. The gentlemen there do not appear to be in 1950s clothing to me. The picture is an example of the type of beauty that was admired by admirers of the picturesque--ruined, overgrown with plants, etc.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

The use of seasons to set the tone JoAnn (9/17/2009 2:51 p.m.)

Dead leaves & dirty bottoms. nan duval (9/17/2009 9:16 p.m.)
- Great observation! *nfm* MarianneR (9/18/2009 4:20 a.m.)
- Picturesque beauty Barbara (9/17/2009 10:05 p.m.)
  - The painting...? BarbaraB (9/18/2009 1:02 p.m.)
    - How can you see their attire? Graciela (9/18/2009 4:32 p.m.)
      - Attire BarbaraB (9/18/2009 5:34 p.m.)
    - 1794 Barbara (9/18/2009 3:23 p.m.)
      - Those hats look so 50s but...   BarbaraB (9/18/2009 4:45 p.m.)
        
        Clever of Turner!   CarolTS (9/19/2009 4:06 a.m.)
        
        Looks more like breeches,   kathleen (elder) (9/18/2009 5:52 p.m.)
  - I agree nan duval (9/17/2009 10:34 p.m.)
    - I can see both of these cases JoAnn (9/18/2009 1:56 a.m.)
Timeline Rachel G (9/17/2009 3:13 p.m.)
- Thank you!! JoAnn (9/17/2009 5:12 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo