Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Sensible?   Written by Carol J. (9/6/2009 3:57 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Sensibility, penned by BarbaraB
Are you new?

Yes, after previously reading S&S and having watched the two of the adaptations, I agree that JA was not using the word "sensible" as we would use it today. Marianne was not what I would call "sensible". Maybe "sensitive" or "emotional" would be better adjectives for our time. I think JA was trying to convey that Marianne relied on her feelings--her senses.

Honestly, the first time I read S&S, I didn't like Marianne. Since I identified more closely with Elinor, I found Marianne to be shallow and immature. In fact, I felt that way about a number of the characters. Did JA seize upon an aspect of her culture to make a point? But we will have opportunity to discuss that more at a later date...


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast