Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


If that's the case, then shouldn't Henry Dashwood's   Written by kathleen (elder) (9/6/2009 10:00 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, It must be considerable..., penned by Reeba
Are you new?

income have been fairly large from his life interest in half of his first wife's fortune? I'm trying to work out whether Henry Dashwood (& his second wife) were careless in planning for the future. If there was a good income from this life interest, then I don't understand why they didn't save more toward the future.

Do you think that John's annual income was 10,000 pounds (or more) even without the 4000 from Norland?


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast