You don't have to be 'original'

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

You don't have to be 'original' Written by Jan (10/15/2006 2:58 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Thanks, although..., penned by Mandy N

to be interesting...

The point is that you have drawn together what you have read and what you think and then applied that to this aspect of S&S. I have read what Maggie Lane and others have to say about sensibility but I was particularly keen to hear your own opinion as I have enjoyed all your posts on the romantic movement etc. Your posts present a very interesting perspective and thanks very much for elaborating.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Focus : Romanticism. The private & the public ; Letters. Mandy N (10/13/2006 1:57 a.m.)

Many thanks to you all. Mandy N (10/19/2006 3:39 a.m.)
This is a great focus... BarbaraB (10/15/2006 10:11 p.m.)
This is wonderful and I love that picture too! nfm :D Robbin (10/14/2006 3:48 p.m.)
Living in society vs living in conflict with it Tracy W (10/14/2006 5:42 a.m.)
- Enjoyed reading this post, thanks. nfm BarbaraB (10/15/2006 10:08 p.m.)
- Great post ... Robbin (10/14/2006 3:45 p.m.)
Very interesting Mandy Jan (10/13/2006 12:02 p.m.)
- Elinor & Sensibility. Mandy N (10/13/2006 6:54 p.m.)
  - Brilliant Rae (10/14/2006 2:07 p.m.)
    - Thanks, although... Mandy N (10/14/2006 2:27 p.m.)
      - You don't have to be 'original' Jan (10/15/2006 2:58 p.m.)
Marianne seems to be... Reeba (10/13/2006 9:47 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo