Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


I don't think it's that ambiguous   Written by Barbara (9/28/2006 5:14 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Is height a beauty standard?, penned by Mary Ellen
Are you new?

Jane Austen equates tall with striking in this same novel. In Ch. 6, Lady Middleton is described : " her figure tall and striking".

Therefore, even if we don't want to trust the grammatical construction of the sentence, which does, indeed, point to Marianne being the taller of the two, if we agree that the 'striking' part is referring to Marianne, then the taller part is also.

Also, Marianne declares in Ch.3 that Edward's "figure is not striking". Then, in the last chapter of this section, when she sees a man approaching on horseback and hopes it's Willoughby, Elinor says "Indeed, Marianne, I think you are mistaken. It is not Willoughby. The person is not tall enough for him, and has not his air."

It turns out to be Edward, not Willoughby. This again points to tall=striking.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast