Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


I don't infer so; who's taller; plumpness   Written by Tom P2 (9/28/2006 3:31 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Is height a beauty standard?, penned by Mary Ellen
Are you new?

[Marianne's] form, though not so correct as her sister's, in having the advantage of height, was more striking;

I can only make sense of that grammar by reading "in ... height" as an adverbial phrase referring to "was". Hence Marianne is the taller, and there's no reason to suppose that height had anything to do with correctness of form.

Elsewhere, JA quite often refers to plumpness and bloom as positive aspects of beauty. This fits with an old fundamental view, that beauty equates to the visible signs of good health. Thinness and pallor aren't a good look when, say, tuberculosis is a major threat.

That last paragraph hereby applies for asylum on the GR board. It just wouldn't be the same if it had to break up and trot off to Austenuations and L+T. ;-)


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast