Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Carriage but no horses?   Written by Tracy W (9/18/2006 5:17 p.m.)
Are you new?

In chapter 5 we have:


The horses which were left her by her husband, had been sold soon after his death, and an opportunity now offering of disposing of her carriage, she agreed to sell that likewise at the earnest advice of her eldest daughter. For the comfort of her children, had she consulted only her own wishes, she would have kept it; but the discretion of Elinor prevailed.

I'm a bit lost. Horses without a carriage strike me as more use than a carriage without horses. Why would Mrs Dashwood have wished to keep the carriage if the horses were already sold?

Was it easier to rent horses than to rent a carriage?


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast