Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


I'm sure JA considered it unfair.   Written by Mandy N (9/16/2006 4:26 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, It does seem very unfair, doesn't it? -nfm, penned by Maisy
Are you new?


Certainly, the Law of Primogentiture protected Norland for the male line of a family.

Yet JA mentions Mr Dashwood's own disappointment at the terms of Uncle Dashwood's will as it left him no power to provide for his second family.
I think money was more vital for security of the daughters than his son because the fortune the first Mrs Henry Dashwood brought to the marriage was settled on John and possibly, any money he received by marrying Fanny.

When John dismissed his intention of financial assistance to his step-mother and sisters, it wasn't a legal crime yet John and Fanny show themselves up as moral bankrupts.
An additional £4,000 per annum from Norland could enable provision for his sisters' dowries without finacially bankrupting the estate for reasons of kindness and family.

It does seem unfair especially being legal !


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast