Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


If you are hard on Darcy, you are also hard on Lizzy.   Written by Adrian (6/23/2007 2:29 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Darcy has not changed in essentials, penned by Robbin
Are you new?

Both Lizzy and Darcy knew the score and neither told Jane (ever, from what we can deduce). As you say, it does give one pause. Jane suggests she will make sure he is not so malleable in the future.


"Would you believe it, Lizzy, that when he went to town last November, he really loved me, and nothing but a persuasion of my being indifferent would have prevented his coming down again?"

"He made a little mistake, to be sure; but it is to the credit of his modesty."

This naturally introduced a panegyric from Jane on his diffidence, and the little value he put on his own good qualities.

Elizabeth was pleased to find that he had not betrayed the interference of his friend; for, though Jane had the most generous and forgiving heart in the world, she knew it was a circumstance which must prejudice her against him. (Ch. 55)

We know Jane can be firm when she thinks herself in the right and that Bingley's first loyalty will now be to her, so I am satisfied on that score, but I am amused that JA immediately mentions Lizzy's gratitude that Jane still does not know about Darcy's interference.

It is not unusual for Darcy to turn away and refuse to continue an unpleasant, pointless conversation.

"Yes, indeed," cried Mrs. Bennet, ... "I assure you there is quite as much of that going on in the country as in town."

Everybody was surprised, and Darcy, after looking at her for a moment, turned silently away. Mrs. Bennet, who fancied she had gained a complete victory over him, continued her triumph. (Ch. 9)

Perhaps Darcy sees no point in troubling Jane (or Lizzy) with the pain an apology would cause, especially since somehow Lizzy's concealment might also come out and cause coolness between the sisters. I cannot say I am entirely comfortable with this omission on Darcy's part; but perhaps JA did not feel it was necessary for her characters to be perfectly consistent so long as they were essentially good.

I must admit, however, that in several instances I start to wonder whether Darcy's abhorrence of "disguise of any sort" wavers later in the book, or whether it was only his illusion to begin with.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast