yes...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

yes... Written by Ra (6/15/2007 8:15 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, How interesting! Thank you *nfm*, penned by Marie C

... in those days, anyone could be thin - it was just a sign of malnourishment, not superior self-control as today. Thin people got ill faster, apparently, and had less energy to survive TB and suchlike.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Chapter 49: Regency standards for beauty Silvia O (6/14/2007 1:00 p.m.)

Mrs. Bingley & Mrs. Quentin Robbin (6/14/2007 2:57 p.m.)
- Thank you very much Robbin! Silvia O (6/15/2007 5:28 p.m.)
- Good to see this one again... Moni (6/15/2007 12:19 a.m.)
- Yes, I think Beauty was plumper then :-) Line (6/14/2007 8:38 p.m.)
- How interesting! Thank you *nfm* Marie C (6/14/2007 4:48 p.m.)
  - yes... Ra (6/15/2007 8:15 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo