Perhaps not: your version agrees with....

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Perhaps not: your version agrees with.... Written by Adrian (6/12/2007 6:26 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, A mistake in my version of the text?, penned by Silvia O

...The Annotated Pride and Prejudice (ed. David M. Shapard), p 510. While some dislike Dr. Shapard's commentary, I have not heard his version of the text disputed. Perhaps the Pemberley e-text has a typo. The punctuation (question marks) are different too, but then I'm not sure that was standardized. I'll ask.

Basically I think the meaning remains the same

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Waiting for letters Cheryl (6/9/2007 11:32 p.m.)

A letter from Darcy to Elizabeth ? Silvia O (6/10/2007 11:42 a.m.)
- Mrs. G thought there was more to the relationship... Adrian (6/10/2007 12:32 p.m.)
- Normally, yes... Rose G (6/11/2007 5:29 a.m.)
  - The 'understanding' Lisa Maree (6/12/2007 2:22 a.m.)
    - That's my understanding ;) Rose G (6/12/2007 5:40 a.m.)
      - An interesting, elusive discussion   Adrian (6/12/2007 12:09 p.m.)
        
        A mistake in my version of the text?   Silvia O (6/12/2007 5:07 p.m.)
        
        Perhaps not: your version agrees with....   Adrian (6/12/2007 6:26 p.m.)
        
        It's not very important anyways,   Silvia O (6/17/2007 8:07 p.m.)
        
        Unless Mrs. G repeated it to herself ...   Adrian (6/18/2007 12:38 p.m.)
- Very true. Silvia O (6/12/2007 5:00 p.m.)
I say again, I wish I had an Aunt and Uncle Gardiner! Cathy Allen (6/11/2007 1:47 p.m.)
- IMO the threat of having your husband/father die in a duel Graciela (6/11/2007 2:41 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo