Interesting theory...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Interesting theory... Written by Silvia O (6/10/2007 6:43 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Double entendre and underscoring, penned by Marie C

That the letters should not be made public because the double meanings are obvious makes a lot of sense, since we cannot expect Lydia to be clever enough to write false things to her family convincingly.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Words to be made public Adrian (6/7/2007 12:42 p.m.)

Double entendre and underscoring Marie C (6/9/2007 1:44 p.m.)
- Interesting theory... Silvia O (6/10/2007 6:43 p.m.)
That's the way I read it too Becky K (6/9/2007 1:26 p.m.)
In other words, lines vs. lines Jessica T (6/7/2007 11:50 p.m.)
Letters and lines under words - a question for Julie! Line (6/7/2007 9:53 p.m.)
- Yes, it was Emily Silvia O (6/9/2007 1:08 p.m.)
  - Not quite the phrase Adrian (6/9/2007 5:43 p.m.)
    - I read it differently Christopher (6/10/2007 3:19 p.m.)
      - lines under the words Katy B (6/11/2007 1:47 a.m.)
        
        Indeed, I agree with the underlining camp Mary Ellen (6/11/2007 11:10 a.m.)
    - Oh! I see Silvia O (6/10/2007 2:10 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo