Thanks, Line, I think you are correct

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Thanks, Line, I think you are correct Written by Cathy Allen (6/6/2007 4:00 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, What did JA mean by "a large party"?, penned by Line

"...she (JA) just didn't mention all these people because they were not necessary to the plot!"

I thought this might be true, but I wondered what others thought.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

travelling with a "large party" Cathy Allen (6/5/2007 5:45 p.m.)

A large party with even more servants Mary Ellen (6/6/2007 12:48 p.m.)
- Mary Ellen, I'm not sure... Line (6/6/2007 6:49 p.m.)
  - Perhaps you are correct, but... Mary Ellen (6/9/2007 3:34 a.m.)
Would the logistics been staggering? Tracy W (6/5/2007 9:39 p.m.)
- Let's stay on topic Myretta (6/6/2007 6:31 a.m.)
What did JA mean by "a large party"? Line (6/5/2007 7:10 p.m.)
- Thanks, Line, I think you are correct Cathy Allen (6/6/2007 4:00 p.m.)
- A large party, part 2 Line (6/5/2007 7:51 p.m.)
  - I always thought this was just exaggerated gossip! (nfm) Cathy Allen (6/6/2007 4:02 p.m.)
    - Yes, it's definitely gossip Line (6/6/2007 6:39 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo